Foremost Opines (Rs 2-5, 4; Decs 6-6d/5, 34-3/9, 9/12)
Introduction Unlike some of our justices and their expansive reading of our Constitution, in which these justices are proud to find constitutional rights “in penumbras…of emanations”*, Foremost interprets the laws established in the ROG as a “strict constructionist.” In other words, he turns first to the text itself so that his rulings depend not on various outcome-oriented rationales and conclusions which, however twisted, F suspects might be pleasing to a high percentage of his Readers, but rather he tries to…